Discussion utilisateur:79.54.179.65

CGP and GAOS...

Hello,

I have read the three external web pages you have added, two of them don't speak of GCP at all. Only one, http://le.cos.free.fr/gcp.htm, claims that GCP is part of GAOS, but it is an unofficial web page without sourcing nor identifiable reputation. It would be an unsatisfactory source on its own, but when I see that well-established publications such as https://www.lopinion.fr/secret-defense/le-gaos-du-renfort-pour-les-forces-speciales-de-larmee-de-terre or https://artofuss.blog/2021/08/09/dans-le-secret-des-forces-speciales-incontournables-face-au-terrorisme-et-aux-nouvelles-menaces/ contradict it, it is more likely to be just wrong.

So please stop pushing the notion that GCP is part of GAOS, unless you back it up with a reliable (I repeat : a reliable) source.

And by the way, please stop saying this is "new", le.cos.free.fr was already claiming this "information" SEVEN years ago (https://web.archive.org/web/20170315200403/http://le.cos.free.fr/gcp.htm) so it's nothing new - and it makes even stranger that no other publication has supported this claim since.

And by the way², GAOS is not equivalent to SFSG; it is a reserve of individual specialists, it doesn't operate as an infantry unit like SFSG, which shows that you don't have a good knowledge of what you are talking about.

Thanks in advance, rob1bureau (discuter) 7 janvier 2024 à 00:57 (CET)

you know what, as you say, I see that you know everything about everything, sas, sfsg, delta force, gcp, cia, etc so keep staying on wikipedia if the funds you mentioned are more reliable than mine it means you have some problem... and yes, a structure that is 7 years old is new to me... 79.54.179.65 (discuter) 7 janvier 2024 à 02:39 (CET)

GCP

the gcp now is part from gaos

gaos is one unit of COS, what is so hard to understand? 79.54.179.65 (discuter) 7 janvier 2024 à 02:29 (CET)