Aller au contenu

« Automorphisme de graphe » : différence entre les versions

Un article de Wikipédia, l'encyclopédie libre.
Contenu supprimé Contenu ajouté
MathsPoetry (discuter | contributions)
création à partir de la page anglais - je ne garderai probablement pas tout, par manque de temps plus que par manque d'intérêt :-(
(Aucune différence)

Version du 22 décembre 2012 à 16:53

In the mathematical field of graph theory, an automorphism of a graph is a form of symmetry in which the graph is mapped onto itself while preserving the edge–vertex connectivity.

Formally, an automorphism of a graph G = (V,E) is a permutation σ of the vertex set V, such that the pair of vertices (u,v) form an edge if and only if the pair (σ(u),σ(v)) also form an edge. That is, it is a graph isomorphism from G to itself. Automorphisms may be defined in this way both for directed graphs and for undirected graphs. The composition of two automorphisms is another automorphism, and the set of automorphisms of a given graph, under the composition operation, forms a group, the automorphism group of the graph. In the opposite direction, by Frucht's theorem, all groups can be represented as the automorphism group of a connected graph – indeed, of a cubic graph.[1][2]

Computational complexity

Constructing the automorphism group is at least as difficult (in terms of its computational complexity) as solving the graph isomorphism problem, determining whether two given graphs correspond vertex-for-vertex and edge-for-edge. For, G and H are isomorphic if and only if the disconnected graph formed by the disjoint union of graphs G and H has an automorphism that swaps the two components.[3]

This drawing of the Petersen graph displays a subgroup of its symmetries, isomorphic to the dihedral group D5, but the graph has additional symmetries that are not present in the drawing. For example, since the graph is symmetric, all edges are equivalent.

The graph automorphism problem is the problem of testing whether a graph has a nontrivial automorphism. It belongs to the class NP of computational complexity. Similar to the graph isomorphism problem, it is unknown whether it has a polynomial time algorithm or it is NP-complete.[4] There is a polynomial time algorithm for solving the graph automorphism problem for graphs where vertex degrees are bounded by a constant (Luks 1982). It is known that the graph automorphism problem is polynomial-time many-one reducible to the graph isomorphism problem, but the converse reduction is unknown.[5][6][7]

Algorithms, software and applications

While no worst-case polynomial-time algorithms are known for the general Graph Automorphism problem, finding the automorphism group (and printing out an irredundant set of generators) for many large graphs arising in applications is rather easy. Several open-source software tools are available for this task, including NAUTY,[8] BLISS[9] and SAUCY.[10][11] SAUCY and BLISS are particularly efficient for sparse graphs, e.g., SAUCY processes some graphs with millions of vertices in mere seconds. However, BLISS and NAUTY can also produce Canonical Labeling, whereas SAUCY is currently optimized for solving Graph Automorphism. An important observation is that for a graph on n vertices, the automorphism group can be specified by no more than n-1 generators, and the above software packages are guaranteed to satisfy this bound as a side-effect of their algorithms (minimal sets of generators are harder to find and are not particularly useful in practice). It also appears that the total support (i.e., the number of vertices moved) of all generators is limited by a linear function of n, which is important in rumtime analysis of these algorithms. However, this has not been established for a fact, as of March 2012.

Practical applications of Graph Automorphism include graph drawing and other visualization tasks, solving structured instances of Boolean Satisfiability arising in the context of Formal verification and Logistics. Molecular symmetry can predict or explain chemical properties.

Symmetry display

Several graph drawing researchers have investigated algorithms for drawing graphs in such a way that the automorphisms of the graph become visible as symmetries of the drawing. This may be done either by using a method that is not designed around symmetries, but that automatically generates symmetric drawings when possible,[12] or by explicitly identifying symmetries and using them to guide vertex placement in the drawing.[13] It is not always possible to display all symmetries of the graph simultaneously, so it may be necessary to choose which symmetries to display and which to leave unvisualized.

Graph families defined by their automorphisms

Several families of graphs are defined by having certain types of automorphisms:

  • An asymmetric graph is an undirected graph without any nontrivial automorphisms.
  • A vertex-transitive graph is an undirected graph in which every vertex may be mapped by an automorphism into any other vertex.
  • An edge-transitive graph is an undirected graph in which every edge may be mapped by an automorphism into any other edge.
  • A symmetric graph is a graph such that every pair of adjacent vertices may be mapped by an automorphism into any other pair of adjacent vertices.
  • A distance-transitive graph is a graph such that every pair of vertices may be mapped by an automorphism into any other pair of vertices that are the same distance apart.
  • A semi-symmetric graph is a graph that is edge-transitive but not vertex-transitive.
  • A half-transitive graph is a graph that is vertex-transitive and edge-transitive but not symmetric.
  • A skew-symmetric graph is a directed graph together with a permutation σ on the vertices that maps edges to edges but reverses the direction of each edge. Additionally, σ is required to be an involution.

Inclusion relationships between these families are indicated by the following table:

Skeleton of the dodecahedron
Skeleton of the dodecahedron
Shrikhande graph
Shrikhande graph
Paley graph
Paley graph
distance-transitive distance-regular strongly regular
F26A graph
F26A graph
Nauru graph
Nauru graph
symmetric (arc-transitive) t-transitive, t ≥ 2
(if connected)
Holt graph
Holt graph
Folkman graph
Folkman graph
Complete bipartite graph K3,5
Complete bipartite graph K3,5
vertex- and edge-transitive edge-transitive and regular edge-transitive
Skeleton of the truncated tetrahedron
Skeleton of the truncated tetrahedron
Frucht graph
Frucht graph
vertex-transitive regular
Skeleton of the triangular prism
Skeleton of the triangular prism
Cayley graph

See also

References

  1. « {{{1}}} ».
  2. « {{{1}}} ».
  3. « {{{1}}} ».
  4. A. Lubiw, "Some NP-complete problems similar to Graph Isomorphism", SIAM Journal on Computing, 10 (1981), pp. 11-21.
  5. R. Mathon, "A note on the graph isomorphism counting problem", Information Processing Letters, 8 (1979), pp. 131-132
  6. « {{{1}}} »
  7. Jacobo Torán, "On the Hardness of Graph Isomorphism", SIAM Journal on Computing, vol. 33 (2004), no. 5, pp. 1093-1108, DOI 10.1137/S009753970241096X
  8. « {{{1}}} »
  9. « {{{1}}} »
  10. « {{{1}}} »
  11. « {{{1}}} »
  12. « {{{1}}} »; « {{{1}}} ».
  13. « {{{1}}} ».