Discussion utilisateur:Pumpie

Une page de Wikipédia, l'encyclopédie libre.
Aller à : navigation, rechercher

Bienvenue sur Wikipédia, Pumpie

N'hésite pas à consulter comment modifier une page pour de premières indications sur la création et l'édition des pages sous Wikipédia. Tu peux également consulter la FAQ et faire tes essais dans le bac à sable.
N'hésite pas à consulter les recommandations à suivre (règle de neutralité, copyright...).
Dans les pages Projet, il y a sans doute un sujet qui t'intéressera.
Enfin, ce tableau liste toutes les pages d'aide.

Pour signer tes messages, tu peux taper trois fois le caractère ~. Avec un quatrième tilde, en plus de ta « signature », seront affichées la date et l'heure. Les articles encyclopédiques ne sont pas signés. Nous utilisons des sigles parfois mystérieux : tu pourras trouver leur explication sur la page jargon.

Si tu viens d'une autre Wikipédia, n'oublie pas de mettre les liens vers tes autres pages perso.

Si tu le désires, tu peux aussi nous dire d' tu viens et tes centres d'intérêt.

Si tu as des questions à poser, n'hésite surtout de pas à me contacter ou à les poser dans le bistro local.

-- Orthogaffe 2 mai 2004 à 01:40 (CEST)

Salut, quand tu fais des interwikis, peux-tu mettre un petit truc dans la boîte de résumé (par exemple +en:) et marquer la modification comme mineure ? R 21 sep 2004 à 15:58 (CEST)

Ano Fanari[modifier | modifier le code]

Bonjour,

J'ai vu dans l'historique que tu avais créé l'article Ano Fanari. Il n'a guère évolué depuis. Je songe à le proposer à la suppression : il n'a pas vraiment d'intérêt encyclopédique. Qu'en penses-tu ? Cédric 17 février 2007 à 18:02 (CET)

Analyse automatique de vos créations (V1)[modifier | modifier le code]

Bonjour.

Je suis Escalabot, un robot dressé par Escaladix. Je fais l'analyse quotidienne de tous les articles créés deux jours plus tôt afin de détecter les articles en impasse, les articles orphelins et les articles sans catégorie.

Un article en impasse est un article qui ne contient aucun lien interne et un article orphelin est un article vers lequel aucun article encyclopédique (donc hors portail, catégorie, etc.) n'a de lien interne. Pour plus de détails sur les liens internes, vous pouvez consulter cette page.

Les catégories permettent une classification cohérente des articles et sont un des points forts de Wikipédia. Pour plus de détails sur les catégories, vous pouvez consulter cette page.

Ajouter des liens ou des catégories n'est pas obligatoire, bien sûr, mais cela augmente fortement l'accessibilité à votre article et donc ses chances d'être lu par d'autres internautes d'une part et d'être amélioré par d'autres contributeurs d'autre part.

Pour tout renseignement, n'hésitez pas à passer voir mon dresseur. De même, si vous constatez que mon analyse est erronée, merci de le lui indiquer.

Si vous ne souhaitez plus recevoir mes messages, vous pouvez en faire la demande ici, néanmoins, je vous conseille de laisser ce message tel quel et, dans ce cas, j'ajouterai simplement mes prochaines analyses, à la suite les unes des autres. Escalabot (d) 29 février 2008 à 05:23 (CET)

Analyse du 27 février 2008[modifier | modifier le code]

Pumpie's problems[modifier | modifier le code]

I understand on what to do on Wikipedia. This is what I am going to do. I will properly edit and I will edit more properly. Pumpie (d) 3 novembre 2010 à 19:00 (CET)

Now that I have explained my problems, will I ever restore my talk page communication on the English Wikipedia? Pumpie (d) 4 novembre 2010 à 18:15 (CET)

I told you quite clearly how to do that; take a break from wikipedia for an entire year, and during that year take an English class. Once you have completed that class, I will ask for your talk page access to be restored, and you may show how you have dramatically improved your English comprehension. If you are able to show this(you still have not) your chances for being unblocked would improve dramatically themselves.Daedalus969 (d) 5 novembre 2010 à 23:02 (CET)

Too long, no way, I will type again with dramatic improvements in my English. I can create no errors, this time, it will be different in my edits, my comprehension will be a success. It is not necessary for semi-expert users to use an English class, I can use some Wikisource and others to improve my English skills and overcome spelling problems on Wikimedia, I will show this. I favor to be unblock a week or two, maybe a month after my block. Pumpie (d) 6 novembre 2010 à 00:20 (CET)

No, you won't, because no one is willing to unblock you for any less. If you want to come back, then you need to leave and go take a class. It isn't good enough to learn as you edit, and no one will accept that; you must understand this, because you will not be unblocked otherwise.Daedalus969 (d) 6 novembre 2010 à 02:53 (CET)
Also, it is irrelevant what is required of 'semi-expert' users; it is required for you, and no amount of saying otherwise will change that on en. If you do not leave for a year, and continue to push for your unblock, or continue to act as if you are going to be, then I will remove the reminder about your talk page rights from my own talk page; you are effectively de-facto banned from wikipedia for your unwillingness to cooperate and understand what the real problem is. It is not good enough to learn as you write; english courses/classes in schools take a year to complete. So take a year-long-break from wikipedia to focus solely on your english comprehension and grammar. When you have completed the courses, and only when you have completed them, then come back here and prove that you have a dramatically better understanding of english than you previously did.. And self-study through wiki-source is not good enough; wiki-source is not school. Take an actual class in an actual, physically existing school. And I can promise you with no doubts, that if you do any less, you will remain banned from the english wikipedia, forever. A year pales in comparison, so I suggest you take the offer.Daedalus969 (d) 6 novembre 2010 à 03:00 (CET)

Simple English Wikipedia[modifier | modifier le code]

I know that Simple English Wikipedia is for people like me but I will get over it and handle this situation. I should like improve my English, prior, one subject worked, in my later articles, one subject didn't work, more subject will work. I don't favor myself supporting the poor grammar of English. This will also be posted on the English Wikipedia. I will continued to read not only on Wikipedia but on Wikisource to improve my English, even Wikibooks so I can get by spelling the most correct. My sentence ability is: "My big screen TV was in the basement, I head for the backyard and walked and ran around my yard" and "Very very outrageous". Pumpie (d) 5 novembre 2010 à 16:13 (CET)

My other abilities: "Very irresistible", "my comprehensive skills", "I recommend my exercise every hour to two to keep my body in shape". "Cut down on unhealthy snacks". "at a glance". "I will stay out more often to have exciting adventures, even in cool weather with my jacket". "mastery" and "compromise". My test to raise my influence. I understand and reply. Later. Pumpie (d) 6 novembre 2010 à 00:45 (CET)

Other[modifier | modifier le code]

Will my talk page be restored on the English Wikipedia? Will I answer my problems and improve my English better? Pumpie (d) 5 novembre 2010 à 16:13 (CET)

More better and correct than before[modifier | modifier le code]

I have promised that I will correct grammar, I will not make incorrect sentences and grammar errors. I have asked that I will not mess up here. I will correct sentences here. I am not disturbing here. My editing will be slow but it will not be slow later. I will not lack my improvements in all my edits. I will not paste articles until its grammar is correct. Parts of my articles that I did are correct, newer ones will be completely correct, there were a few errors. When I edit again, I will not paste my previous article which I thought it has been corrected, I will make it with correct sentences and not mess up. All of my edits will be almost every sentences that it makes sense even in its spelling. I am really trying to correct my aritcles and creating articles without a single mess, it will never be messy again. I will first do disambiguation pages and other articles that properly needed to be translated or have its spelling correct. Pumpie (d) 22 novembre 2010 à 17:22 (CET)

"More better and correct" is not correct grammar; again. Go take the class. I am trying to extend good faith, but the above is not promising; all it shows is an unwillingness to cooperate. If I see one more post past the date of this one, on -any- wiki, then you can probably kiss your unban on en goodbye, because I will be removing the reminder from my talk page.Daedalus969 (d) 10 décembre 2010 à 06:59 (CET)

Why not letting me return, much of my problems of my editing have been solved[modifier | modifier le code]

I cannot figure out my remaning of my other problems though I have written good before. Figure out what was my problems on several recent articles and updates. Some have been accepted. I have solved most of my problems and some other has to be solved. I have a high brilliance and I cannot do errors that includes most of the article pasting and approximates with the pasting technique (pasting filmography, bibliography and discography is an exception but I cannot mess up some of the titles, all the correct English titles that are already translated, most approximates and most available translated names must be corrected). I can do full proper sentences and even more including correcting and modifying works by users that lack excellent spelling but not to fool around or use incorrect words. I am cooperating and not lacking incorrect spellings. I have made most of my promises an I can overcome my problems that I have experiences in the spelling. I have no frustrations about this, now I can cope with my spelling problems and I can avoid misusing spelling and use correct words and words that make sense.

Is anyone there, one administrator on the English Wikipedia with an excellent grammar and without any sloppiness in writing that had never posted to me help me explain my problems from recent months?

I'm losing my partial excitement and concentration here and I have already asked and I will not ask again to be unbanned due to my spelling capabilities that I am doing not only here but on my computer that is not online like my wordpad, some of that I should do since it can improve my spelling, I haven't done that in several years. I have asked that I can return because I have the ability to correct and write correctly though almost where I cannot do errrors. I am skilled in disambiguation links (thouse yet to be added). My thinking cannot be strained when I am explaining some other of my problems that is not yet solved. You know that I will never do errors again. now that I can type better, some of my other problems needs to be solved. My thinking cannot be strained, some things that are needed to be done I cna think and I have to think them. I am now taking a break here. Pumpie (d) 12 décembre 2010 à 02:40 (CET)

I am now taking by break, bye. Pumpie (d) 12 décembre 2010 à 02:41 (CET)